Correct
Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted
Show answer & explanationHide answer
Answer: (D) Neither conclusion (I) nor (II) follows.
Explanation
Combining the statements "All ground is wind" and "All wind is earth" gives the relation that all ground is earth. Since "Some tables are ground", the intersection between tables and ground is non-empty. Since all ground is part of earth, this intersection must also be part of earth, meaning some tables are definitely earth. This directly invalidates Conclusion (I) which states that no tables are earth.
For Conclusion (II), the statement "All ground is earth" establishes that ground is a subset of earth, but it does not mean that earth is a subset of ground. Therefore, we cannot conclude that all earth is ground.