SSC CGL Tier 1 2024 English Comprehension Questions with Solutions

Explanation

The standard syntax for a declarative sentence in English follows the Subject-Verb-Object/Adverbial (SVO/SVA) pattern. In this arrangement, the pronoun Q (we) serves as the subject, followed immediately by the verb O (went). The destination is then specified by the prepositional phrase formed by R (to the) and S (park). Finally, the adverb of time P (yesterday) is placed at the end of the sentence to indicate when the action occurred. This sequence Q-O-R-S-P results in the grammatically correct and coherent sentence: We went to the park yesterday.

Explanation

Paralyzed describes a condition of being incapacitated, immobilized, or unable to function normally due to a loss of power or ability. In contrast, healthy refers to a state of being in good physical and mental condition, characterized by full functionality, vigor, and the absence of any such impairment or disease. Therefore, healthy is the most appropriate antonym as it represents the optimal functional state that is the direct opposite of being paralyzed.

Explanation

An agenda is a formal document or list that outlines the specific topics, tasks, or business items intended to be discussed, addressed, or acted upon during a scheduled meeting. It serves as a structural guide for the proceedings, helping to ensure that all necessary matters are covered in an organized sequence and that the meeting remains focused on its intended purpose.

Explanation

The sentence is in the passive voice of the Simple Past tense, following the structure: Object + was/were + past participle (V3) + by + Subject. To convert it into the active voice, the structure must follow: Subject + Simple Past verb (V2) + Object. In this case, the narcotics team acts as the subject, arrested is the V2 form of the verb, and the drug pedlar serves as the object.

Explanation

The segment contains an adverbial error because the word dear is used where the adverb dearly is required. In standard English, when modifying a verb like pay to describe the heavy cost or severe consequences of an action, the adverbial form dearly is the appropriate choice. While dear can occasionally function as a flat adverb in specific idioms like cost someone dear, the standard expression for suffering significant consequences for a mistake is to pay dearly. Therefore, the adjective dear should be replaced with the adverb dearly to correctly modify the verb phrase.

Explanation

The phrase come rain or shine is a common English idiom used to indicate that an event or action will take place regardless of the circumstances, particularly the weather. It expresses a firm commitment or determination to fulfill a promise or complete a planned activity no matter what difficulties or obstacles may arise. In this context, it emphasizes that the movie outing will definitely happen tomorrow, regardless of any external factors.

Explanation

The sentence follows a logical cause-and-effect structure starting with a subject and its location, followed by a condition and a resulting action. The sequence begins with part B and part D to form the complete subject phrase the shelf in the kitchen. This is followed by the verb phrase in part A and part F, needs to be replaced, so I will, which establishes the necessity for a change. The sentence concludes with part E and part C, need to buy a piece of wood, which provides the solution to the stated problem. The full meaningful sentence is: The shelf in the kitchen needs to be replaced, so I will need to buy a piece of wood.

Explanation

The original sentence is in the past continuous tense, which follows the structure: Subject + was/were + V1-ing + Object. When converting this to the passive voice, the object becomes the new subject, and the verb form changes to: Subject (receiver) + was/were + being + V3 (past participle) + by + Object (doer). In this case, experiments is a plural subject, so it is followed by were being conducted. This structure accurately maintains the continuous aspect of the original action while shifting the focus from the scientists to the experiments being performed.

Explanation

The sentence employs the causative structure, which consists of the verb have followed by an object and a past participle. This grammatical pattern is used to show that a person arranged for an action to be done to something by someone else. In the phrase He had the clipping clipped into smaller clips, the word clipping functions as the noun or object representing the item to be cut. The word clipped is the past participle of the verb to clip, which describes the action performed on that object. This combination correctly completes the causative phrase while maintaining logical consistency and proper syntactic form.

Explanation

The passage centers on the principle of causality, specifically the idea that an individual's circumstances are a direct consequence of their own deeds rather than external fate or celestial influence. This is supported by the subsequent analogy of sowing and reaping, where the outcome is determined by what one does. Furthermore, the text explicitly mentions the law of karma and states that rewards, punishments, and the fruits of life are decided by one's past conduct. Therefore, actions is the most logically consistent word to describe the source of success or failure in this context.

Explanation

The sentence structure requires a verb that agrees with the third-person singular subject he in the simple present tense, as the surrounding context uses verbs like depends and does. The phrase to the extent he does it refers back to the performance of the action mentioned earlier in the sentence. In English grammar, the third-person singular present form of the verb do is does. This choice maintains grammatical consistency and logical parallelism, emphasizing that the result of an action is determined by both the nature of the act and the intensity with which the individual carries it out.

Explanation

The word supreme is the most suitable choice as it describes the law of karma as an ultimate and overriding power. In the context of the passage, it refers to a mindset where individuals believe this law is the highest authority governing their lives. This belief leads to the fatalistic conclusion mentioned in the text—that a person's destiny is fixed by this supreme law, making individual effort appear unnecessary because the outcome is perceived as being already determined by an all-powerful force.

Explanation

The passage contrasts positive actions with negative ones to illustrate that consequences are the direct result of an individual's behavior. The sentence structure employs parallelism, where honesty and hard work are paired as positive traits that receive rewards. In the second part of the sentence, the blank precedes and evil deeds, requiring a noun that represents a negative trait to serve as a thematic opposite to honesty. Dishonesty fits this requirement perfectly, completing the pair of negative actions that, like evil deeds, will inevitably face consequences.