ExamDay Logo
ExamDay
UPSC MainsGeneral Studies Paper IModern Indian HistoryPractice question

Salient Features of Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms

Discuss the salient features of Montague-Chelmsford Reforms.

Discuss~250 words2 min readmedium
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Introduce the context of the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms enacted through the Government of India Act, 1919. In the body, systematically discuss the key provisions at the provincial and central levels, administrative innovations, and a brief critical appraisal of dyarchy. Conclude by highlighting its legacy in shaping India's federal and parliamentary constitutional framework.

Model answer

387 words

Introduction

The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms, codified through the Government of India Act, 1919, were formulated following the August 1917 Declaration. The declared objective was the 'progressive realization of responsible government' in British India by introducing limited self-governing institutions and administrative decentralisation.

1. Introduction of Dyarchy at the Provincial Level

  • Division of Provincial Subjects: Provincial subjects were demarcated into two distinct categories: 'Transferred' and 'Reserved'.
  • Transferred Subjects: Included nation-building portfolios such as Local Self-Government, Public Health, and Education. These were administered by the Governor with the advice of Indian Ministers responsible to the provincial legislative council.
  • Reserved Subjects: Included crucial administrative departments like Police, Justice, Land Revenue, and Finance. These were administered directly by the Governor and his Executive Council without accountability to the legislature.
  • Structural Limitations: Dyarchy failed in practice because crucial financial powers remained under reserved control, starving transferred departments of funds. Additionally, the Governor retained overriding veto powers over ministerial decisions.

2. Changes in the Central Executive and Legislature

  • Bicameralism at the Centre: The Imperial Legislative Council was replaced by a bicameral legislature consisting of the Council of State (Upper House) and the Legislative Assembly (Lower House).
  • Indianization of the Executive: It mandated that three of the six members of the Viceroy's Executive Council (other than the Commander-in-Chief) were to be Indians.
  • Elections and Franchise: Introduced direct elections for the first time, though the franchise remained severely restricted based on property, taxation, and educational qualifications.
  • Extension of Communal Representation: Communal electorates were retained and further extended to include Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and Europeans.

3. Administrative and Financial Innovations

  • Separation of Budgets: For the first time, provincial budgets were separated from the central budget, conferring provincial legislatures the authority to enact their own budgets.
  • Establishment of New Offices: Created the office of the High Commissioner for India in London, transferring certain agency functions previously performed by the Secretary of State for India.
  • Public Service Commission: Provided statutory provision for establishing a Central Public Service Commission for recruiting civil servants, which was subsequently set up in 1926.

Conclusion

Although dyarchy proved structurally unworkable and fell far short of nationalist demands for self-rule (Swaraj), the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms marked a critical milestone in India's constitutional history. They laid institutional, electoral, and legislative precedents that formed the bedrock of the Government of India Act, 1935, and eventually the Constitution of independent India.

Key facts to remember

definition
Dyarchy (Rule by Two)

A system of dual government introduced in British Indian provinces under the Government of India Act, 1919, dividing governance into reserved subjects (Governor and Executive Council) and transferred subjects (responsible ministers).

scheme
Government of India Act, 1919

British parliamentary statute implementing the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms, which introduced provincial dyarchy, bicameralism at the centre, and direct elections with a restricted franchise.

example
Central Public Service Commission (1926)

Established pursuant to the provisions of the 1919 Act on the recommendation of the Lee Commission, marking the origin of the modern Union Public Service Commission (UPSC).

Frequently asked questions

Why did dyarchy fail in the Indian provinces under the 1919 Act?

Dyarchy failed due to structural defects: vital departments like Finance were classified as reserved subjects, depriving Indian ministers in transferred departments of adequate budgetary control, while Governors retained absolute veto powers.

← All questions on this topic (161)